Annual exams should focus on identifying at‑risk MASH, where intervention can change outcomes

(…) the urgency of this approach has become more apparent when we consider the global prevalence of obesity.
– Naim Alkhouri, Co-director of the Global Think-Tank on Steatotic Liver Disease
When it comes to liver health in the context of obesity, the question isn’t whether screening should take place during routine annual exams—it should. The real issue is what we’re screening for, and in whom. For individuals living with obesity, especially those with additional risk factors, the focus should be on detecting at‑risk MASH, which can lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer.
Recognising at-risk MASH has clear clinical implications: it can influence treatment decisions, prompt closer monitoring, and potentially alter the disease trajectory. This is particularly important when we speak about individuals with medically complicated obesity—those with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m² or with obesity-related comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, or obstructive sleep apnea. In this population, interventions could have the greatest impact if we are aiming to flag liver disease progression early.
The urgency of this approach has become more apparent when we consider the global prevalence of obesity. About 16% of adults aged 18 years and older worldwide were obese in 2022. Without risk-targeted screening, healthcare systems face a worrying reality that a large population at risk of progressive liver disease will be overlooked.
It is true that finding MASLD in an individual living with obesity often doesn’t change the medical approach. Management remains focused on lifestyle modification including weight loss, and controlling comorbidities. However, a diagnosis of at‑risk MASH does alter the care pathway, whether it is the additional monitoring and consideration of liver‑directed treatments, or more careful follow-up.
Cue now a risk-based screening strategy.
From a policy standpoint, this means moving toward precision in prevention: enabling primary care providers to screen the right people at the right time using evidence‑informed and practical approaches such as automated reflex testing. It’s not about adding burden to wellness visits—it’s about making smarter decisions based on known risk and clinical value.
The challenge now is: are we ready to change how we think before the disease does?
Further reading
- EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)
- Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in NAFLD
- Global patterns of utilization of noninvasive tests for the clinical management of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease
- A call for doubling the diagnostic rate of at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis




















































